Other
API event sites ...

 


Visit
API's topic library ...
The topic sites in our library offer gateways to information on body condition scoring, beef cow efficiency, country-of-origin labeling, targeting the Certified Angus Beef® brand and more.

 

Sign up for ...

 

 

Angus Productions Inc.
Copyright © 2012
Angus Productions Inc.

Strategies to Improve Beef Safety

 
by Kindra Gordon for Angus Productions Inc.

 

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (Feb. 1, 2012) — An update on current research being done by scientists at the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) in Clay Center, Neb., to reduce the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 was provided at Cattlemen’s College in Nashville, Tenn., Feb. 1. The Cattlemen’s College event is a series of educational seminars convened as a precursor to the kick-off of the 2012 Cattle Industry Convention Feb. 1-4.

 

MARC speakers

USMARC researchers (from left) Jim Bono, Elaine Berry and Terry Arthur shared highlights of their research efforts with producers during Wednesday's Cattlemen's College.

USMARC researchers Elaine Berry, Terry Arthur and Jim Bono shared highlights of their research efforts with producers. The trio is part of a team of 10 scientists focused on food safety at USMARC. In addition to focusing on E.coli O157:H7, these individuals also shared that emerging research is being done to help better identify and understand the six strains of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli that were proposed for regulation last fall.

 

In her remarks, Berry emphasized that reduction of pathogen transmission from manure and hide is critical to protect the food and water supply, and to minimize transmission to other animals in the production environment.

 

Present research that Berry is focused on is examining the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 among animals fed a high percentage (40%) of wet distillers' grains (WDGS). Berry explained that they’ve found that E. coli appears to persist longer in the manure of animals fed a high-WDGS diet. She explained that because the ethanol production process removes starch from corn, the resulting manure has a lower pH, which is more hospitable to E. coli.

 

A study was conducted where cattle were fed 0% WDGS and 40% WDGS. Berry reported that high levels of WDGS (40%) in finishing diets did increase E. coli O157:H7 prevalence and the percentage of animals with enumerable high levels in feces and on hides.

 

Berry said this presents a new question: Can WDGS be fed in diets initially, but removed from the diet prior to harvest to reduce the E. coli prevalence?

 

A second study to examine E. coli levels in WDGS-fed cattle has been conducted. Cattle were fed varying levels of WDGS (0%, 40% and 70%) during the finishing phase, and then at 56 days were shifted to diets with lower levels of WDGS (0%, 15% and 40%).

 

Berry reported that the cumulative prevalence and percent enumerable for E. coli O157:H7 in feces was:

Similar results were found for the prevalence of E. coli on hides.

 

Berry and her colleagues concluded that reductions in WDGS in the diet did not result in much reduction for E. coli O157:H7 in feces by Day 28, but did by Day 56. For hides, reductions in WDGS in the diet resulted in reduction of E. coli O157:H7 prevalence by Day 28, and most treatments were still lower by Day 56. Thus, she indicates some management changes could be implemented at the feeding phase to reduce E. coli risks.

 

Specifically, she said, “Reductions for E. coli O157:H7 in feces took 56 days and on hides took 28 days, so a period of 56 days for feeding the lower levels of WDGS (15%) may be an acceptable strategy to reduce E. coli O157:H7 before harvest.” 

 

Berry also reported briefly on research work at MARC using soil solarization of the feedlot pen surface to reduce all forms of E. coli populations. While more research is needed, she said the initial results show that it can be an effective tool, as well.

 

Terry Arthur provided an overview on research being done during the postharvest phase. He noted that cattle hide is the major source of E. coli carcass contamination going into the processing plant — and a recent study he was involved with found that the cattle were primarily being contaminated with E. coli in the facilities at the processing plant.

 

Arthur reported that if those carcasses went through a hide-washing cabinet prior to entering the plant, E. coli O157:H7 prevalence on the hide was about 4%. If the hides were not washed, the prevalence was about 38%. Thus, he emphasized for the industry that hide wash cabinets at plants could be a good intervention tool.

 

Jim Bono shared his work using genomic approaches for controlling foodborne pathogens. Bono is working to identify markers and sequence the genome for non-O157:H7 E. coli. While those solutions are still in development, once identified, they will be an asset in the efforts to reduce E. coli risks in the food chain.

 

-----------------------------

Editor’s Note: The above article was written under contract or by staff of Angus Productions Inc. (API). It may not be reprinted without express permission of API. To request reprint permision, contact the editor at 816-383-5200.

 

www.4cattlemen.com is an event coverage site provided by the editorial team at Angus Productions Inc. (API), publisher of the Angus Journal, the Angus Beef Bulletin, the Angus Beef Bulletin EXTRA and the Angus e-List. For questions about this site, to submit an article for our consideration, or to report a broken link, contact the editor at 816-383-5200; 3201 Frederick Ave., Saint Joseph, MO 64506.

 

API claims copyright to this web site as presented. We welcome educational venues and cattlemen to link to this site as a service to their audience.